Drawdown & Safe Withdrawal Simulator โ Australia
Accumulation calculators tell you when you can stop. This one tells you whether stopping was a good idea. It runs thousands of randomised market paths against your portfolio and spending plan, then reports how often the money lasted โ and what the range of outcomes actually looks like.
The retirement you are testing
Everything here is in today's dollars.
That is a 4.00% starting withdrawal rate.
A 37-year retirement.
How you spend
Spend the same real amount every year regardless of markets. The classic Trinity study assumption, and the harshest test.
Adds an indexed government payment from age 67. Most Australian retirees receive at least a part pension.
Asset mix
Cash is whatever is left: 5%.
Success rate over 37 years
69.1%
Across 4,000 simulated market paths, that is how often the portfolio still had money at age 92. When it failed, the median run ran dry around age 81.
- Starting withdrawal rate
- 4.00%
- Safe spend at 95%
- $35,719
- Implied safe rate
- 2.38%
General information, not advice
Range of outcomes
Every simulated market path, summarised. The dark band holds the middle half of outcomes; the pale band holds 80%.
- Median path
- 25thโ75th
- 10thโ90th
Where you end up
The spread of final balances across every simulation. The leftmost bar is the share of runs that ran out of money; the last bar collects the top 5%.
- Median ending balance
- $1,122,272
- Poor outcome (10th)
- $0
- Good outcome (90th)
- $8,000,334
In today's dollars
Assumptions and limitations
Every result above rests on these assumptions, and each can be changed in the inputs. Why the defaults are reasonable
- Shares
- 6.5% real, 17.5% volatility
- Bonds
- 2.0% real, 7.0% volatility
- Cash
- 0.5% real, 1.2% volatility
- Shareโbond correlation
- 0.10
- Fees
- 0.50% a year
- Simulations
- 4,000
Limitations
- Returns follow a normal distribution. Real markets have more extreme years than a normal distribution allows, so the success rate may overstate how safe a plan is.
- No tax. Withdrawals and investment earnings are not taxed. Spending should already allow for the tax you expect to pay, or the success rate will be too high.
- The defaults reflect long-run history. If future returns are lower than in the past, success rates will be lower too. Try the market assumptions a notch lower.
- The Age Pension is a flat amount you add. It is not means-tested here, and may be less or nothing in practice.
Reading this honestly
What the number does and does not tell you.
A success rate is not a probability of a good life โ it is the share of simulated paths where a rigid spending plan never hit zero. Real retirees notice a bad decade and adjust. That is exactly why the guardrails rule scores so much better than the fixed rule on identical assumptions: modest flexibility is worth more than a larger portfolio.
These paths are drawn from a normal distribution around the return and volatility you set. That is a reasonable model, but real markets have fatter tails and returns are not independent from one year to the next, so a difference of a few points โ 94% against 97%, say โ is within the modelโs margin of error.
For most Australian retirees the Age Pension acts as a floor that a simulation like this ignores unless you switch it on. Turning it on is usually the single largest change to the success rate โ and it is the more realistic assumption.
How this works
What are the odds my money outlasts me?
Sequence of returns is the real risk
Two retirements with identical average returns can end very differently depending on when the bad years arrive. A crash in your first five years forces you to sell more units to fund the same spending, and the portfolio may never recover. That is why an average return is not enough and a distribution of paths is.
Everything is in real terms
Returns, spending and final balances are all inflation-adjusted, so a dollar in year one means the same as a dollar in year forty. This makes the success rate directly comparable to the Trinity study and other published safe-withdrawal research.
Flexibility beats size
Switch the spending rule from fixed to guardrails and watch the success rate move. Being willing to trim spending by ten percent in a bad stretch is usually worth more than several years of extra saving โ and it is a far cheaper form of insurance.
What the model assumes
Annual returns are drawn from a normal distribution around the mean and volatility you set, with a correlation between shares and bonds. Real markets have fatter tails and some mean reversion, so treat the exact percentage as an indicator rather than a forecast.
The 4% rule, tested rather than assumed
The 4% rule says you can withdraw 4% of your portfolio in the first year of retirement, then the same amount adjusted for inflation each year, and expect it to last 30 years. It comes from William Bengen's 1994 study and the 1998 Trinity study, both based on US share and bond returns since 1926.
This simulator tests your own withdrawal rate instead of borrowing theirs. It draws a year of returns for shares, bonds and cash thousands of times over, applies your spending rule, and reports how often the money lasted to the end age you set, along with the range of balances left behind.
Australian retirees draw down through account-based pensions
Most Australians fund retirement from super through an account-based pension. Earnings in the pension are tax free, and payments to someone aged 60 or over from a taxed fund are tax free too. The law sets a minimum payment each year, as a percentage of the balance on 1 July (Moneysmart):
| Age | Minimum each year |
|---|---|
| Under 65 | 4% |
| 65 to 74 | 5% |
| 75 to 79 | 6% |
| 80 to 84 | 7% |
| 85 to 89 | 9% |
| 90 to 94 | 11% |
| 95 and over | 14% |
If you plan to spend less than the minimum, the excess still has to be paid out of the pension, though it can be saved or invested outside super. The simulator does not apply the minimums, because money withdrawn does not have to be spent; it tests whether your spending can be sustained.
Sequence risk: why the order of returns matters
Two retirements with the same average return can end very differently. A fall in the first few years forces you to sell more to fund the same spending, and those units are not there for the recovery. That is why a simulation that varies the order of returns tells you more than a single average.
The drawdown simulator's "Poor outcome (10th)" figure shows what the worst tenth of paths left behind. If that figure is uncomfortable, the levers are spending, the spending rule, the asset mix and the end age.
Spending rules
- Fixed spends the same real amount every year regardless of markets. It is the Trinity study's assumption and the harshest test.
- Guardrails trims spending when the withdrawal rate drifts too far above where it started, and raises it when the portfolio runs ahead. A modest willingness to cut in bad years usually improves the success rate a lot.
- % of portfolio draws a fixed share of the current balance each year, above a floor. The money cannot run out entirely, but income moves with the market.
Adding the Age Pension
Switch on "Include the Age Pension" to add a payment of $30,000 a year from 67, kept level in today's dollars, roughly the full single rate with supplements. Because the pension is means-tested, a large portfolio would receive less, at least until it has been drawn down; the simulator does not apply the tests (Services Australia). For many retirees the pension acts as a floor under spending in later life, which is why it can raise the success rate noticeably.
Frequently asked questions
What is a safe withdrawal rate in Australia?
There is no single safe rate. The 4% rule was built on US data and 30-year retirements; longer retirements and different assets point to lower rates, and a willingness to cut spending in bad years points to higher ones. The simulator shows how often the rate you choose lasts on your assumptions, and the highest spending that meets your target success rate.
What does the success rate mean?
The share of simulated market paths in which the portfolio paid your spending every year to the end age. A 90% success rate means one path in ten ran out early. The simulator's safe spend is the highest spending that meets your target success rate, 95% by default.
Do I have to withdraw a minimum from super?
From an account-based pension, yes: at least 4% of the balance a year under 65, rising with age to 14% from 95 (Moneysmart). Money withdrawn above what you spend can be saved or invested outside super.
Are the returns real or nominal?
Real. Returns, spending and balances are all in today's dollars, so results compare directly with the Trinity study and other published research.
Does the simulator include tax?
No. Withdrawals and earnings are not taxed. For an account-based pension paid after 60 that is usually close to right; for money outside super, set your spending to include the tax you expect to pay.
Sources
Keep going
Other Australian calculators
FIRE
The full projection: earliest retirement age, the bridge years, and whether the money lasts.
Coast FIRE
Find the point where you can stop contributing and let compounding finish the job.
Barista FIRE
Model part-time income covering part of your spending while the portfolio keeps growing.
Lean FIRE
Independence on a deliberately small budget โ and an honest test of whether it survives.
Fat FIRE
A no-compromise retirement, where contribution caps and tax become the binding constraint.